srakaafrican.blogg.se - When is cannot one word

The default program for that file type opens, where you can enter any text or data you want. In these examples, "cannot" as one word is not an option. To create a new file that is inserted into your Word document or email message: In the Object dialog box, click the Create New tab, and then select an option from the Object type list. Then you can not only be nothing, you can do nothing too.

A very quiet and tasteful way to be famous is to have a famous relative.

I like that people who are not experts can not only understand but also become engaged by my work.

My dog can not only roll over but also play dead.

Danielle can not only cook but also bake.

It is possible to see "can" and "not" as two separate words, especially with the correlative conjunction "not only.but also." This is most useful in an exclamatory sentence, i.e., one that ends in an exclamation mark.) (The two-word version makes it clearer that the word "not" should be emphasized.

Conflict can not survive without your participation.

Remember that you can use "can not" to emphasize to the "not." Here are some examples:

Three things cannot be long hidden: the sun, the moon, and the truth.

A flower cannot blossom without sunshine, and man cannot live without love.

You cannot escape the responsibility of tomorrow by evading it today.

Here are some famous quotation featuring "cannot": The Bible cannot be the “Word of God” if it contains obvious irrefutable evidence of error."Cannot" and "can not" are interchangeable as expansions of the contraction "can't." However, the modern preference is to use "cannot." Of note, many spellcheckers even highlight "can not" as an error. In this section we give several instances (of hundreds) found in the New Testament that describe the same event in two or more contradictory versions.

Here are four events that have two or more versions of events presented in the New Testament. Matthew and Luke have two very different versions of the birth of Jesus. Matthew: Jesus was born under the reign of Herod who died in 4 BC. Luke: Jesus was born after Cyrenius instituted the tax (6 AD) that Caesar Augustus decreed. There are four different versions of the resurrection. Each writer of the Gospels has a different number of people present at the tombstone: Angels, guards, Mary, Mary Magdalena, all appear at different times depending on the author. Here is one conflicting verse from each Gospel.įor a complete analysis of these variations see the Bible is wrong about Jesus’ birth 3.

There are 28 generations listed from David to Jesus in Matthew’s ( Matt 1:1-16) genealogy, while Luke’s ( 3:23-31) has 43. Matthew 1:6-16 David Solomon Roboam Abia Asa Josaphat Joram Ozias Joatham Achaz Ezekias Manasses Amon Josias Jechonias Salathiel Zorobabel Abiud Eliakim Azor Sadoc Achim Eliud Eleazar Matthan Jacob Joseph Jesus Except for David at one end and Jesus at the other, only three names in the two lists that are the same. Luke 3:21-32 David Nathan Mattatha Menan Melea Eliakim Jonan Joseph Juda Simeon Levi Matthat Jorim Eliezer Jose Er Elmodam Cosam Addi Melchi Neri Salathiel Zorobabel Rhesa Joanna Juda Joseph Semei Mattathias Maath Nagge Esli Naum Amos Mattathias Joseph Janna Melchi Levi Matthat Heli Joseph Jesus Luke goes on to give the genealogy from David all the way back to Adam! We really wonder, how it is possible that Luke and Matthew were able to find and record their genealogies of Jesus., given the difficulty that we have today with tracing our own genealogies. They did not even have access to the Mormon’s excellent computerized genealogy database as we do. The truth is they copied them from ancient sources that were themselves totally made up of whole cloth since both Adam and David are figments of the Jewish collective imagination. Nonetheless the point is made, the Bible cannot be the word of God if it contains obvious irrefutable evidence of error. Which genealogy is correct? You shouldn’t have to ask if the Bible really was the word of god. In these passages we see that Matthew has Jesus arriving in Jerusalem on two animals at once. Matthew could not possibly have seen this. Neither Mark nor Luke nor John say that Jesus arrived in Jerusalem on two animals. Luke 6: 17 And he came down with them, and stood in the plain, and the company of his disciples, and a great multitude of people out of all Judaea and Jerusalem, and from the sea coast of Tyre and Sidon, which came to hear him Who recorded these passages? Matthew 5:1 And seeing the multitudes, he went up into a mountain : and when he was set, his disciples came unto him: Matthew in his zeal to show that Jesus arrival fulfills Scriptures misunderstands the form of Hebrew poetry used in Zachariah 9:9. The passages referenced below are presented in the Bible as literal truth, yet there is no way according to the situation described in the Bible, that anyone could have heard or recorded these conversations even at the time the words were uttered. Here is another example of where Luke demonstrates that the whole story is fabricated.